Header 3

Age Better Today. Is This Really Possible? (Part 1)

Age Better Today

We age every moment we are alive. But the process of aging appears different depending on where one sits on the curve of life. When we are young, aging develops us. When we are old, aging diminishes our abilities. But aging begins before its effects are apparent. It’s just that we’re more likely to care about it when it’s evident. The desire within humans to avoid the perils of biological aging is as old as time itself, but now aging is a field of scientific inquiry, and the promise of extraordinary solutions is imminent. One big aim of this field is to find ways to extend lifespan. Just as interesting, if not more so, is to find strategies that preserve abilities throughout the duration of life. This article is the first in a series to address both.


Extending Lifespan without Health Has Major Issues

In the last 100 years, several factors have contributed to a significant extension of lifespan. This includes advances that help fight infectious disease (hygiene to antibiotics), drugs and medical techniques that decrease mortality risk for the sick, and even some improvements in nutrition (mostly addressing calorie and nutrient adequacy). This is an incredible feat. However, it has not been accompanied by an equally large increase in the length of time a person spends living with full health (i.e., healthspan). Old age is still the most important risk factor for a host of chronic diseases – such as atherosclerosis, diabetes, most cancers, and dementias – because as we age there is an increasing amount of time to accumulate damage. Eventually, the cumulative damage induced by living overwhelms the body’s ability to fully repair itself. It is at this point where we start to recognize signs of aging more reliably.


We Can’t Afford to Extend Life without Extending Health  

Diseases that occur with a greater incidence as we age account for the majority of health care expenditures in developed nations. We now see chronic disease happening earlier in life. When you combine this with modern medicine’s ability to extend life in the unhealthy, we have an unsustainable and undesirable condition for humanity, especially when considering that the world’s elderly population has been growing more rapidly than ever. Thus, extending lifespan without extending healthspan actually presents major problems for the individual and his or her family and support team. It may also threaten social and economic stability in a manner never seen before.


Conventional Medicine Has Not Addressed Biological Aging

Modern medicine treats symptoms of conditions that occur when biological damage occurs. This at least partly explains the paradigm of preventing and managing each age-related disease individually. While this approach certainly has its merits, having already prolonged and improved countless lives, it rarely attacks the root cause of these conditions. But even if we were to eliminate diseases that cause premature mortality, which is a primary focus of modern medicine, medicine still does not intend to address biological aging directly. Estimates based on mortality data in the United States predict that if cancer was eliminated as a cause of death, average human life span would increase only 3-4%. The same is true if ischemic heart disease were to be cured. That means if you eliminate these two major causes of premature mortality, median life expectancy in the US would go from 76 to 83 years old. While we do want to cure diseases that cause us to die early, additional enhancements to the aging process can occur beyond the treatment of disease, especially when the focus of our health treatment moves beyond symptom management. Either medicine needs to change or we need to find other credible sources that care for our health in ways modern medicine does not in order to attain a complete approach to life-long health. 


An Exciting Future for Those Alive Today

There is now hard evidence (but incomplete) that suggests with certain dietary, lifestyle, and pharmacological interventions, it is possible to make age a modifiable risk factor. In other words, with the right multipronged stack of strategies, more humans can realistically delay the loss of function and perform youthfully well into 6th, 7th, 8th, maybe even the 9th decade of life. Soon, however, this preservation of function may be shifted even further into the lifespan, and lifespan itself may be elongated to heretofore unprecedented levels.

Therefore, for those seeking to maximize “years of life and life in years” (borrowing a quote from David Katz, MD), high-level aims are to minimize the risk of premature mortality and to optimize techniques that preserve functioning and elongate lifespan. Admittedly, there is overlap in what to do to achieve these aims, but importantly, there are aspects that are mutually exclusive.


What Kind of Evidence Do We Have?


Studies on invertebrates and rodents noted by Fontana et al., 2010 have shown that some forms of dietary restriction can extend lifespans by up to 30-50%. These regimens act on biochemical pathways that are evolutionarily well-conserved, meaning that they remain relatively unchanged across a large segment of the tree of living organisms. This makes it scientifically conceivable that the lifespan-elongating effects demonstrated in numerous model organisms – ranging from yeast, worms, flies, rodents, and primates – may also be seen in humans.

Unfortunately, studies directly measuring the effects of an intervention on human lifespan are difficult to design and carry out. These types of research protocols require long study periods, which are often highly impractical and raise complex ethical issues. Therefore, in humans, most of the evidence to date has relied upon surrogate measures to inform us of the potential of a therapy to extend life and to extend health. A surrogate measure is a measure that can be assessed today – for example, blood pressure and waist circumference – that is thought to have value in predicting the future outcome of a therapy or even a health condition. A specific example could be measuring an inflammatory marker in response to dietary fasting to then estimate the potential of fasting as a therapy to extend health and life, given that chronic inflammation is associated with reductions in health and lifespan.

Preliminary studies on the effects of these dietary restrictions have been carried out in humans and have shown benefits in surrogate measures of aging. Some benefits demonstrated include delayed deterioration of the functioning of our autonomic nervous system, delays in age-related stiffening of cardiac tissue, and the slowing of disease progression in those with existing diabetes and dementia.

This is exciting because it suggests that we can modify the way we eat – a lifestyle factor that is well within our control – to produce real results towards the outcome we seek. The next blog post in this series will take a closer look at various forms of dietary restriction, its effects on aging, and possible mechanisms by which the desirable effects of a specific intervention occur.


  • James

    Of course this is an issue that undoubtedly will score pretty high on everybody’s list of priorities. Whether we know already enough beyond the readily available nutritional suggestions is I think rather questionable. Yes, we know about the calorie restriction. Yes, we know about the restriction of Omega 6 intake. A diet more oriented in the direction of ancestral health. Yet, There is, it seems to me, a large area of significant importance that science doesn’t seem to want to approach outside the well trod paths of neuronology, with which I mean that so far it appears that even though we have not been able to make any headway in the case of all neurological disorders while focusing on the neurons and how they are affected by all sorts of impediments, axons losing myelin, neurons getting plastered with amyloid beta, there seems to be an unwillingness to consider the glia biome as the more important part.
    Am I mistaken in suspecting a struggle of ego’s?
    The whole aging process, and how long it can go on, depends on the times a cell can divide, does it not? Every time a cell divides part of the chromosome end (telomere) goes with it, correct? In the end there is nothing left to pass on. This is in my opinion the cause of deteriorating neurological conditions: the defense system cannot keep up anymore. The microglia are finished, mitochondria become distressed, abeta, which until then had some function in the long chain FA conversion.
    Of course there is more involved but I have a feeling that reducing inflammation holds one of the keys to longevity. And not just longevity, but a healthy longevity.

    • danpardi

      Hi @JamesPott:disqus, great points and let me say this. Obviously this is a massive topic so my aim here is to give a reasonable overview of various strategies that affect some part of this process. The next post will take a deeper dive into diet and dietary restriction, but the last few posts in the series will cover advancements in pharmacological therapies (and other techniques) that may move us beyond the efficacy of an ideal lifestyle to improve and elongate health. It’s a fun series to work on. I won’t address your points here because I will address them specifically in the future posts (that I’m still working on), but thank you for your input, and please keep thoughts and questions flowing in the comments. The feedback and questions I get here can still direct what I write in these subsequent posts!

  • Vivek Menon

    It seems like every time a (generally active) supercentenarian is asked “what’s your secret?”, the response is a combination of simple lifestyle factors: “gardening”, “crossword puzzles”, “being happy”! There has to be some common underlying mechanisms that either limit cellular damage, or maintain restorative function better/longer. Those mechanisms would also have to be fairly universal, in order to keep all different organs and tissues “young”. Also, how does external stimuli up-regulate these mechanisms (i.e. hormesis). This is a fascinating topic to explore!

    • danpardi

      @madisonvm:disqus, you make a great point. My suspicious is that mental outlook is enormously important. For one, it partially dictates how stressful the world is for you, internally. Second, the right outlook in life might also determine how much you engage in social activities, and also behaviors considered healthy. I’ll be exploring the hormetic effect on stress resistance up-regulation in subsequent posts.

  • Pingback: Does Protein Restriction and Fasting Slow the Aging Process? Better Aging Part 3 | Dan's Plan()

  • Pingback: Science Recap: Fructose, Fitbits, Antibiotics and the Microbiota, and More | Dan's Plan()

  • Pingback: Which Exercise Intensity Makes You Smarter Right Now? Exercise and Cognition, Part 1 | Dan's Plan()

  • Pingback: Get a 10-15% Increase in Lifespan from This Easter Island Substance? | Dan's Plan()